Fake Donors, Foreign Cash, and a Cover-Up: ActBlue Illustrated

Their own lawyers warned them. They said f*** it.

Read it here.

The Democrat Smurfs - Infographic

Research by Tony Seruga.

Read it here.

Infographic: Why Most Countries Ban Mail-In Ballots

Based upon research by John R. Lott.

Read it here.

FEATURED COMMENT: How the Democrats Turn Out Their Base

Sounds plausible:

Original Post

PAPA B: Counting Votes in 1948

By Papa B

In 1948, I loved baseball and the Electoral College (a year later I discovered girls). Both were the reason I was selected for the Quiz Kids. In 1948, it was the famous Truman vs. Dewey election. I had made up a “spreadsheet” showing the results going back to 1860. On election eve, I stayed up to tabulate the results.

As I remember, the results were in by about 2:00 AM.

Understanding that the population was less than half of today’s, here we are 74 years later. We have all the technology, and yet we don’t know the results.

What a mess and what incompetence?

My Response to Papa B: "Not incompetence. Pure malevolence. Ballots now mean more than real voters. The GOP better adapt --- and fast."

INFOGRAPHIC: The Killing Fields

By Biff Spackle

ARE THERE REALLY 60 FAILED GOP ELECTION FRAUD LAWSUITS? The Legendary Ivan Koloff Drops a MOAB on the Myth

By Ivan Koloff, Legendary Great

I recently received via an unsolicited email the following message. It begins:

Can you answer the question:  Do you believe the election results are fraudulent and Trump should have won a 2nd term?

I responded to the sender as follows: 

I don’t believe the election results are “fraudulent.”  Nor do I believe that Trump was reelected. 

That said, substantial questions have been raised about the voting process in certain key states, and it is in everyone’s interests to investigate and answer those questions. 

FACTCHECK.ORG CONFIRMS: We are a stinking hot pile of garbage laced with animal feces [Georgia Vote Fraud Edition]

In short, if you trust "Politifact" or "FactCheck.org" to adjudicate questionable claims, you better start looking for other sources.

Exhibit 5,003,406: The "Factcheck" article -- which attempted to debunk overwhelming evidence of Georgia election fraud -- asserted that there was never any water main break in State Farm Arena, where absentee ballots were tallied, and that counting never stopped.

Too bad the Internet always leaves evidence, this time in very plain sight. Here are the right-wing, pro-Trump alt-right kooks at CBS reporting very late on Election Day (not at 6:07am):

INFOGRAPHIC: The Shocking Allegations of Mass Vote Fraud Made by Sidney Powell in Georgia

So easy to consume, even Democrats can understand...

NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL: Dominion Voting Systems Execs Fail to Appear for Testimony; Office Shuttered, Websites and Social Media Erased

Why, no, this doesn't set off any alarm bells. Unless you're a Democrat praying that the record-breaking election fraud we saw on November 3rd, and 4th, and 5th, and 6th, and 7th... isn't uncovered. Protip: it has been discovered and will be presented in court.

Grove: I was happy that Dominion Voting Systems had been ready to discuss their voting systems that 1.3. million Pennsylvanians trusted in casting their vote. Last night, they canceled their planned participation in today's hearing.

— PA House Republicans (@PAHouseGOP) November 20, 2020

BOOM: NY Times’ Real-Time Election Data Seems to Confirm Massive Georgia Vote Fraud, Eerily Similar to Pennsylvania’s

For the startling, and eerily similar, analysis of apparent Pennsylvania vote manipulation, please see this post.

I've retrieved all of The New York Times' 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Georgia's.

What I found is pretty fascinating, especially because it mimics exactly what happened in Pennsylvania.

As just one example, here is a graph depicting the shifts in votes starting on election day. The X-axis is the date/time and the Y-axis represents the change in votes (positive values denote shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden, in hundreds).

May I call your attention to the differences between the left and the right sides of the graph?

Please note that after about 0100 hours on 11/4/20 Zulu, virtually all vote swings went for Biden.

But you need to see the data. Below is a spreadsheet with the time-series.

NY Times' Michigan Data: Massive Vote Dump at 6AM Wednesday (96% for Biden) Used To Overcome Huge Trump Lead

For the startling analysis of apparent Pennsylvania vote manipulation, please see this post.

I've retrieved all of The New York Times' 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Michigan's.

Below is a graph depicting the shifts in votes in Michigan starting on election day. The X-axis is the date/time and the Y-axis represents the change in votes (positive values denote shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden, in hundreds).

May I call your attention to the differences between the left and the right sides of the graph?

Please note that at about 6:30AM ET, a massive vote dump arrived for Biden, magically bringing Trump's huge lead to almost nil

But you need to see the data. Below is a spreadsheet with the time-series.

The New York Times' Pennsylvania Voting Data Seems to Confirm Massive and Obvious Vote Count Manipulation for Biden

I've retrieved all of The New York Times' 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Pennsylvania's.

What I found is pretty fascinating, especially in Pennsylvania.

As just one example, here is a graph depicting the shifts in votes starting on election day. The X-axis is the date/time and the Y-axis represents the change in votes (positive values denote shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden, in hundreds).

May I call your attention to the differences between the left and the right sides of the graph?

Please note that after about 23:00 hours on 11/4/20 Zulu, virtually all vote swings went for Biden.

But you need to see the data. Below is a spreadsheet with the time-series.

I'm from Ecuador, and I approve this message

Beatriz for the goal.

I’m from Ecuador and I APPROVE THIS MESSAGE.

— Beatriz (@Bea_n2015) November 10, 2020

THEY HAD TO RUSH: How Trump 'Lost' When Almost All Down-Ticket Republicans Won

Via BadBlue Uncensored News.

What probably happened:

They were far further behind than they ever imagined they'd be.
Tens of thousands of votes were needed. Each had to be filled out by hand by volunteers within a few hours.
Skipping all but 'Biden' increased the fake voting speed by a factor of 3 or 4...

— Tim Newport (@logic_101) November 8, 2020

MI, PA, WI JUDICIAL VOTE FRAUD UPDATE: Are Democrat House and Senate Candidates Trapped in a No-Win Situation?

As if Democrats weren’t already fomenting enough chaos with their brownshirts -- Antifa, BLM and the like -- the Supreme Courts of several battleground states have decided to pile on. In Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, Democrat activists dressed in black robes have fundamentally rewritten state election laws. Among their various revisions to these crucial laws:

• Mail-in ballots can be received up to seven (7) days after the election and still be counted
• These ballots can be missing postmarks and still be counted
• The signature on the ballot doesn't even have to match with that of the registered voter
• And, as a bonus, they have banned the Green Party from the ballot to prevent erosion of the Biden vote

All of these illegal proclamations directly contravene state law and are simply naked, partisan attempts to swing the election.

More importantly, they are in clear violation of the Constitution.

CRAPFEST: Number of Vote Fraud Cases Explode as "Progressives" Look the Other Way

By Jason Snead

The Heritage Foundation added another round of cases this week to its ever-growing Voter Fraud Database.

Accounting for these new additions, the database now documents 1,088 proven instances of election fraud, including 949 cases that have resulted in criminal convictions, 48 that have ended in civil penalties, and 75 that have seen defendants enter diversion programs.

Americans should be alarmed, not only because Heritage has compiled so many examples of fraud—impacting nearly every state and elections for all levels of government—but because this figure is likely just the tip of the iceberg.

That Evil, Lying President Trump

Wait, did I say "President Trump"? My mistake. The irreplaceable Larry Elder reminds us about real lies:

Those calling Trump "liar" were fine with SCOTUS upholding OCare mandate as a tax--though Obama insisted it WASN'T:https://t.co/ah5tfS265d

— Larry Elder (@larryelder) August 20, 2017

BUT THERE’S NO EVIDENCE OF VOTE FRAUD: Millions More Registered to Vote Than There Are Adults in the U.S.

Remember how CNN, The New York Times, and the rest of #FakeNews media kept insisting that President Trump was lying about rampant vote fraud?

Well, that thumping sound you heard in the distance was yet another progressive-Communist canard exploding.

More than 3.5 million people in the U.S. are registered to vote than are alive among America’s adult citizens. https://t.co/bQdsGQkIiW

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) August 11, 2017

There's plenty of evidence of rampant vote fraud (remember the 600,000 bogus voter registrations that ACORN was allegedly behind?) but exposing it would only further damage the media's progressive-Communist agenda.

Hat tip: BadBlue Real-Time News.
 

HELPFUL ILLUSTRATION: The Democrat Party Social Pyramid

Straight out of the CCCP (i.e., the invaluable People's Cube) comes this handy set of figures illustrating the official caste system of the Democrat Party.

The first chart depicts the historical hierarchy of ancient Egypt.

The second portrays an eerily similar caste system enforced by the post-Wilson Democrat Party, reinforced by FDR, LBJ and BHO.

Although I do think there was a minor omission on the Democrat Party's chart; can you guess what it is (answer at the end of the post)?